Optimize PBL: Empower Learners by Moving to Authentic, Relevant and Complex Projects
Project based learning has been used as a description for teaching strategies that range in practice from the completion of "recipe projects" to the implementation of real world, life-changing challenges. Today, teachers feel the pressure of high stakes testing, but are often willing to explore more engaging methods of instruction. Our goal is to co-develop an understanding of the potential difference between challenging PBL lessons and authentic, relevant, and complex learning experiences. This conversation will help us to breakthrough the barriers of challenging assignments to dig deep into the tools teachers and leaders need to take research and innovation to the next level by leveraging powerful partnerships within their communities. We will delve into the ways in which teachers can be empowered to empower their learners. The facilitation of this process promotes the development of learners who are inquiry driven and ready to become producers of new information rather than simply consumers of information that already exists. Leaders and learners will engage in a dialogue to deepen their understanding of authentic, relevant, and complex learning environments to support teachers in building literacy rich authentic, relevant and complex projects. They will share innovative practices to dive into the critical thinking skills needed to climb the highest levels to produce creative solutions. In short, the optimization of PBL leads to: creativity, imagination, and innovation through authentic problem solving and complex critical thinking, with relevant communication and collaboration.
Conversational Practice
Extended Socratic Seminar (This is a discussion that prompts the asking of questions to uncover solutions. One conversation starter is given and participants engage in a discussion. The goal is to ask questions as the conversation unfolds. Every question is recorded during the discussion. At the conclusion of the discussion, the recorded questions are affinity mapped to determine three main themes that have emerged from the conversation. This provides a roadmap for further investigations and to allow the conversation to continue in a virtual space once the conference is over.)
Conversation Links
-
Amy StolarskyEast Leyden High School
-
Garreth HeidtPerkiomen Valley High School
-
Jeffrey Rupertus
-
Matt OwenLusher Charter School
-
Peggy GeorgeClassroom 2.0 LIVE
-
Ray O'Brien
-
Adina Sullivan-MarlowSan Diego County Office of Education
-
William SutherlandSalesianum School
-
John MunroRick Hansen Secondary School of Science and Business
-
Craig ElyCollegiate School
-
Marta FouserKing's Academy
-
Nicole RyanMove, Learn, Succeed
-
Michael Klein
-
Joseph ConroyPond Road Middle School, Robbinsville, NJ
-
Kilolo MoyoHarambee Institute of Science and Technology
-
Irene KrugmanFrank McCourt High School
-
Tracey McGrath
-
Terri InloesAcademy School District 20
-
Kristi Froisland
-
Awo Okaikor Aryee-Price
-
Debra Shick
-
Penn GrowAir Academy District 20
-
Scott TottenFlemington-Raritan School District
-
Maryann MolishusCouncil Rock SD
-
Dave QuinnThe University of Rhode Island
-
Sean Conner
-
Stephanie Casperson
-
Laura WitmanEast Penn School District
-
Christine DolenteWilson School District
-
Bryan LakatosThe Miami Valley School
-
Julian MillerLearnmetrics
-
Kevin Harris
-
Kristin HOKANSONSchool Lane Charter School
-
Tod WitmanSchuylkill Valley School District
-
Jennifer KilroyHudson High School of Learning Technologies
-
Bethany SilvaShipley School
-
Maria SommerRiver Vale, NJ Public Schools
-
Teresa KelleyFreire Charter School
-
Paula Don
-
Beth Lloyd
-
Daniel DioGuardiEducate LLC
-
Huie Douglas
-
Robert Dillon
-
Samer RabadiEdutopia
-
Chris AlfanoSLA, Jarvus
-
Rachel Nichols
-
John DownesTarrant Institute for Innovative Education
-
Jill LenickSouth Western High School
-
Amy Gross
-
Rebecca GaunaLindblom Math and Science Academy
-
Melissa Beemsterboer
-
Deb Schiano
No comments have been posted yet.
Log in to post a comment.